People ex rel. New York Clearing House Building Co. v. Barker
New York Supreme Court
Cebtiobabi to review assessment upon the property of the relator.
1Opinion of the CourtBeekman, J.
The relator contends that the commissioners of taxes had no right to consider or estimate any other value of its real estate than the assessed value in determining the amount of its capital which was subject to taxation under chapter 456 of the Laws of 1857. By the terms of that statute, “The.capital stock of every company, liable to taxation, except such part of it as shall have been excepted in the assessment-roll, or as shall have been exempted by law, together with its surplus profits or reserved funds, exceeding ten per cent, of its capital, after deducting the assessed value of its real…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Union Trust Co. v. ColemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- People Ex Rel. Manhattan Railway Co. v. BarkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- People Ex Rel. Edison Electric Illuminating Co. v. BarkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- People Ex Rel. Equitable Gas Light Co. v. BarkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- People ex rel. Consolidated Telegraph & Electrical Subway Co. v. BarkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. McKelvey v. StynerIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
- People ex rel. Eden Musee American Co. v. FeitnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- People ex rel. Eden Musee Americain Co. v. FeitnerNew York Supreme Court · 1900
- People ex rel. New York Clearing-House Bldg. Co. v. BarkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899