United States v. Fidelity-Baltimore National Bank & Trust Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
THOMSEN, Chief Judge.
The question now before the court is whether the government’s action is barred by either limitations or laches. A separate trial has been had on those issues, which were raised by the answer.
During the years 1946, 1947 and 1948, the Maryland Department of Employment Security, a state agency acting for the federal government under Title V of the Servicemen’s Readjustment Act of 1944, as amended, 38 U.S.C.A. § 696 et seq., drew cheeks on an account which the agency maintained with defendant bank and in which it deposited funds supplied by the United States.
For the purposes…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- United States v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
- United States v. BeebeSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. MorganDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1961
- United States v. MyersDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1970
- United States v. The Tug Richard J. MoranDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1962