Legal Opinion

Scovell v. Goldschmidt

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 27, 1991No. 88-2062; CA A61442Published

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

Respondents 1 appeal from a writ of mandamus compelling the director of the Division of State Lands (DSL) to approve petitioner’s application for a fill and removal permit. We reverse.

Petitioner owns property in the Nehalam Bay Estuary in Tillamook County, commonly known as “Botts Marsh,” on which he wants to develop a marina. He must obtain a fill and removal permit from DSL to dredge the estuary and to fill a portion of it for development. Tillamook County adopted a comprehensive plan that includes an exception allowing petitioner’s marina at Botts Marsh. The plan was acknowledged, and, on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bay River, Inc. v. Environmental Quality CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  2. School District No. 48 v. Fair Dismissal Appeals BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  3. Federation of Oregon Parole & Probation Officers v. County of MarionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. Mongelli v. Oregon Life & Health Guaranty Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  5. Dinsdale v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API