Legal Opinion
People v. Castaneda
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 20, 1995No. G015547PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] OPINION
Marco Antonio Castaneda appeals his convictions for drug possession on two separate occasions after the trial court denied his motion to suppress evidence. He raises the same issue on appeal as he did in his motion: did the police officers unreasonably detain and frisk him? We affirm.
FACTS
In 1989, a police officer contacted…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. HensleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Henry v. County of ShastaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- People v. OsborneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- People v. LinnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. VIBANCOCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- People v. H.H.California Court of Appeal · 2009
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.