Legal Opinion
People v. VIBANCO
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 30, 2007No. H029524PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN, Acting P. J.
Defendant Arthur Moreno Vibanco was a passenger in a Cadillac that was stopped by two police officers based on their observations of a cracked windshield and a missing front license plate. (Veh. Code, §§ 5200, 26710.) There were four people inside the car. Defendant, the right rear passenger, attempted to walk away from the car stop but was ordered by the officers first to stay inside the car and then to exit it. While one officer was focused on the driver, the second officer asked defendant for identification. Defendant gave the officer a suspected…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. CorralesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- The People v. LeathCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Calderon v. Kate Spade & Company, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
- In re S.M. CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2015
- James Henry Perozzo v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.