Legal Opinion
Genencor International, Inc. v. Novo Nordisk A/S
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided November 17, 2000No. 120, 2000PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VEASEY, Chief Justice.
In this appeal, we review a holding of the Court of Chancery granting a remedy for breach of contract. Appellant argues that the Court of Chancery erred in denying the full relief sought below. Because we think that the Court of Chancery correctly analyzed the contractual intent of the parties, we affirm.
Facts and Contentions of the Parties
The parties to this appeal, Genencor International, Inc., (“Genencor”) and Novo Nordisk A/S (“Novo Nordisk”), are competitors in the industrial enzyme business. As part of a settlement of patent infringement litigation, the parties…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Levitt v. BouvierSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972
- Lord v. SouderSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
- Wang Laboratories, Inc. v. Mitsubishi Electronics America, Inc. And Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Defendants/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- CBS Inc. v. Ziff-Davis Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
- VonFeldt v. Stifel Financial Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Eagle Force Holdings, LLC v. CampbellSupreme Court of Delaware · 2018
- Leaf Invenergy Co. v. Invenergy Renewables LLCSupreme Court of Delaware · 2019
- Comrie v. Enterasys Networks, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2003
- Galdieri v. Monsanto Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
- Eureka VIII LLC v. Niagara Falls Holdings LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2006
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.