State v. Roach
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Arley Roach was convicted by a jury of second-degree rape. Roach appeals a number of issues involving hearsay and the denial of a requested jury instruction, a Batson challenge, and an objection regarding the State’s use of the word “rape” during trial. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
[¶ 2.] Roach and H.S. were involved in an intimate, three-year relationship characterized by several break-ups. The couple frequently reunited through consensual sexual intercourse.
[¶ 3.] On the evening of February 6, 2011, H.S. tried to end her relationship with Roach because she…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. John Louis Iron Shell, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- State v. LogueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. FloodySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. FaehnrichSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- People v. GibbsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. BirdsheadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. HaugeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. ArmstrongSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. KvasnickaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.