Legal Opinion

State v. Roach

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 2012No. 26212PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Arley Roach was convicted by a jury of second-degree rape. Roach appeals a number of issues involving hearsay and the denial of a requested jury instruction, a Batson challenge, and an objection regarding the State’s use of the word “rape” during trial. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

[¶ 2.] Roach and H.S. were involved in an intimate, three-year relationship characterized by several break-ups. The couple frequently reunited through consensual sexual intercourse.

[¶ 3.] On the evening of February 6, 2011, H.S. tried to end her relationship with Roach because she…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. John Louis Iron Shell, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  3. State v. LogueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. FloodySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. FaehnrichSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. People v. GibbsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. State v. BirdsheadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. HaugeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. ArmstrongSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  5. State v. KvasnickaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API