McNeal-Edwards Co. v. Frank L. Young Co.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
I am unable to agree that there was no jurisdiction under G. L. Mass. e. 227, §§ 2 and 3. Service on the attorney of the Me-Neal-Edwards Company in a suit where, admittedly, the executions could be set off against each other, seems to me a valid service. The present decision is entirely inconsistent with the well-considered opinion of District Judge Francis Lowell in Arkwright Mills v. Aultman & Taylor Co. (C. C.) 128 F. 195, a decision in 1904. The same case was before this court on the merits in 145 F. 783.
In Huntington Mfg. Co. v. Bradford Worsted Spinning Co., in a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Rosenberg Bros. & Co. v. Curtis Brown Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Riverside & Dan River Cotton Mills v. MenefeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Partridge v. The Insurance CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1873
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.