Legal Opinion

McCloskey v. Division of Labor Law Enforcement, Department of Industrial Relations, California

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 17, 1952No. 13102PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEALY, Circuit Judge.

The primary question in this case is whether severance or dismissal pay, in lieu of notice, constitutes wages entitled to priority under § 64(a) (2) of the Bankruptcy Act, or to lien status under § 1204 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. A secondary question is whether, if considered wages, the pay was earned within three months of the date of the commencement of the bankruptcy proceeding. 1

The bankrupt, a wholesale grocery company, on June 2, 1950 made a general assignment for the benefit of its creditors. Thereafter, on July 21, 1950, an involuntary petition was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Public Ledger, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  2. Division of Labor Law Enforcement v. SampsellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re Mammoth Mart, Inc., Debtor. Stanley Cramer v. Mammoth Mart, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
  2. Sam J. Hire v. E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
  3. In Re OttoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1956
  4. In the Matter of the Ad Service Engraving Company, Bankrupt. Nick A. Arabian v. Ralph H. Coleman, Trustee in BankruptcyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
  5. In the Matter of Sleep Products, Inc., BankruptDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API