Legal Opinion

In Re Otto

District Court, S.D. California

Decided November 21, 1956No. 62769PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATHES, District Judge.

This proceeding is here upon the petition of the trustees of Los Angeles Hotel-Restaurant Employer-Union Welfare Fund for review of the Referee’s order of June 29, 1956, denying wage priority under § 64, sub. a (2) of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 104, sub. a(2), to claims for unpaid contributions due from the bankrupt-employer to the Welfare Fund pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement.

There is no dispute as to the facts. At the time of filing of the voluntary petition in bankruptcy, there was in force a collective bargaining agreement between the bankrupt…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  4. Nathanson v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Deitrick v. GreaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1940

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Electrical Workers, Local No. 1 Credit Union v. IBEW-NECA Holiday Trust FundSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  2. Standard Oil Company, an Indiana Corporation v. Edward H. Kurtz, Trustee of Meadow Rock Company, BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
  3. Local 140 Security Fund Claimant-Appellant v. William S. Hack, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Sleep Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  4. Tracy v. Contractors' State License BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Bernard v. Indemnity InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API