State v. King
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Per curiam
James Curtis King appeals from an order of the Circuit Court of Cabell County denying his motion for a new trial under Rule 33 of the West Virginia Rules of Criminal Procedure based on newly discovered evidence. The evidence King relied on was a written confession made after his trial by a third person. Finding no error, we affirm.
Rule 33 provides that a court upon motion may grant a new trial if required in the interest of justice. Our traditional statement of the law about the requirements for a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence is:
“A new trial will not be granted on the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Halstead v. HortonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
- State v. HamricWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. FrazierWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. TalbotSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
- State v. MilamWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- In Re an Investigation of the West Virginia State Police Crime LaboratoryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. CrouchWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. KennedyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. SatterfieldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. HelmickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.