Legal Opinion

State v. King

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1984No. 15991PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Per curiam

James Curtis King appeals from an order of the Circuit Court of Cabell County denying his motion for a new trial under Rule 33 of the West Virginia Rules of Criminal Procedure based on newly discovered evidence. The evidence King relied on was a written confession made after his trial by a third person. Finding no error, we affirm.

Rule 33 provides that a court upon motion may grant a new trial if required in the interest of justice. Our traditional statement of the law about the requirements for a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence is:

“A new trial will not be granted on the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Halstead v. HortonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. State v. HamricWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State v. FrazierWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. TalbotSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  5. State v. MilamWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. In Re an Investigation of the West Virginia State Police Crime LaboratoryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. CrouchWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. KennedyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. SatterfieldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. HelmickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API