Legal Opinion

Luce v. Shoff

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1880PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Prom the Huntington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

— In this action, the appellants, partners under the firm name of C. L. Luce & Co., were the plaintiff's, and the appellees were the defendants, in the circuit court. In their complaint, the appellants alleged, in substance, that *153on the 24th day. of April, 1876, the appellee Harry ShofF, by his note, promised to pay them, by their said firm name of C. L. Luce & Co., the sum of $200, which was due and unpaid; and that, on the same day, the said Shoff, by his certain other note, promised to pay the appellants, by their said firm name, the further sum of $200, which remained unpaid. Eor a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Benson v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Rhodes v. GreenIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Lord v. FisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  4. Morgan v. OlveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Leasure v. CoburnIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Phelps v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Jackson v. DeFabisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Milburn v. PhillipsIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Sedgwick v. TuckerIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API