Luce v. Shoff
Indiana Supreme Court
Prom the Huntington Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.
— In this action, the appellants, partners under the firm name of C. L. Luce & Co., were the plaintiff's, and the appellees were the defendants, in the circuit court. In their complaint, the appellants alleged, in substance, that *153on the 24th day. of April, 1876, the appellee Harry ShofF, by his note, promised to pay them, by their said firm name of C. L. Luce & Co., the sum of $200, which was due and unpaid; and that, on the same day, the said Shoff, by his certain other note, promised to pay the appellants, by their said firm name, the further sum of $200, which remained unpaid. Eor a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Benson v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Rhodes v. GreenIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Lord v. FisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
- Morgan v. OlveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Leasure v. CoburnIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Phelps v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Jackson v. DeFabisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- Milburn v. PhillipsIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Sedgwick v. TuckerIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.