Legal Opinion

Basinsky v. National Casualty Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1922No. 17061PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.

-Suit on an accident insurance policy.

The facts are: The plaintiff was a laborer working-in the woods near the city of Bellingham for Wood-*2Knight Logging Company. On the evening of October 25, 1920, one Mr. Handy, soliciting agent for the defendant, visited the plaintiff at the logging camp and requested him to take out some accident insurance. After some conversation on the matter, and during the same evening, the plaintiff made written application for the insurance. At the same time he gave to the agent an order on his employer for the necessary premium. Early the next morning, to wit, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Starr v. Mutual Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Allen v. Massachusetts Mutual Accident Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  3. Rogers v. Equitable Mutual Life & Endowment Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Douglass v. Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'nNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  2. LaPoint v. RichardsWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Beaty v. Southland Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  4. Hahn v. National Casualty Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1943
  5. American Agency Life Insurance v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API