Legal Opinion

Reihmann v. Foerstner

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 16, 1985No. 84-753PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCORMICK, Justice.

Plaintiff Ivan W. Reihmann appeals from judgment on directed verdicts for defendants on several claims against them. The determinative issues are the sufficiency of evidence to support submission to the jury of claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress, slander, intentional interference with plaintiffs employment contract, wrongful discharge, and breach of an option contract. We hold that the trial court was correct in finding the evidence was insufficient to support jury submission of any of the claims. Therefore we affirm the judgment.

The issues can best be…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Martha D. YOUNG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTHWESTERN SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  2. Harsha v. State Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  3. Vinson v. Linn-Mar Community School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  4. State v. BlythSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  5. Stoller Fisheries, Inc. v. American Title Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Vaughn v. Ag Processing, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  2. Tina Haskenhoff v. Homeland Energy Solutions, LLCSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  3. Soentgen v. Quain & Ramstad Clinic, P.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Strozinsky v. School District of Brown DeerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Larry R. Hedlund v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API