Coffey v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Corp.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPatterson, J.
The plaintiff seeks an injunction pendente lite restraining the defendants, their agents and employees, from using the name “ Ziegfeld ” in connection with a certain theatrical production now being exhibited in New York city under the title “ The Great Ziegfeld,” and from further using the name “ Zieg*187feld ” in connection with any advertising or publicity relative thereto, and from using said name in any theatrical venture or business.
The plaintiff proceeds on the theory that the name “ Ziegfeld ” is an asset and property of the estate of Florenz Ziegfeld, deceased. The production in question…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Washburn v. National Wall-Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897
- Bailly v. BettiNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Blakely v. SousaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
- Messer v. FadettesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
- In re the Estate of SeitzNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Accounting of Chase Manhattan BankNew York Surrogate's Court · 1961
- Yumet Chacón v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1958
- Miller v. Universal Pictures Co.New York Supreme Court · 1959
- In re the Estate of WhalenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1963
- Minevitch v. PuleoNew York Supreme Court · 1957