Legal Opinion

Coffey v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1936PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPatterson, J.

The plaintiff seeks an injunction pendente lite restraining the defendants, their agents and employees, from using the name “ Ziegfeld ” in connection with a certain theatrical production now being exhibited in New York city under the title “ The Great Ziegfeld,” and from further using the name “ Zieg*187feld ” in connection with any advertising or publicity relative thereto, and from using said name in any theatrical venture or business.

The plaintiff proceeds on the theory that the name “ Ziegfeld ” is an asset and property of the estate of Florenz Ziegfeld, deceased. The production in question…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Washburn v. National Wall-Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897
  2. Bailly v. BettiNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. Blakely v. SousaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  4. Messer v. FadettesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  5. In re the Estate of SeitzNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Accounting of Chase Manhattan BankNew York Surrogate's Court · 1961
  2. Yumet Chacón v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1958
  3. Miller v. Universal Pictures Co.New York Supreme Court · 1959
  4. In re the Estate of WhalenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1963
  5. Minevitch v. PuleoNew York Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API