Minevitch v. Puleo
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSamuel M. Gold, J.
This is a motion to dismiss eight canses of action for alleged insufficiency.
The first cause of action seeks damages for the claimed failure of defendant to continue to perform a contract which he had entered into in August, 1944 with plaintiff’s intestate. By that contract, defendant agreed to render his services, as a unique and irreplaceable artistic performer exclusively to plaintiff’s intestate for a period of one year, with options in plaintiff’s intestate to extend the contract for five additional years. By a subsequent modification, plaintiff’s intestate was given options to extend…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Paige v. . FaureNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Sargent v. . McLeodNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Lacy v. . GetmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Nassau Hotel Co. v. Barnett & Barse Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- Nassau Hotel Company v. . Barnett Barse CorporationNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.