United States v. Gladden
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Ferguson, Senior Judge:
This appeal brings up for review the question of whether a sergeant, who participated as a member of the general court-martial that convicted the accused, had been properly detailed to the court and the correctness of the procedure used by the Court of Military Review to decide the question against the accused.
When the case was before the Court of Military Review, the accused contended the court-martial that tried him could not have lawfully proceeded because one of the enlisted members had not been duly detailed as a court member.1 In opposing the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. HurtUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
- United States v. EvansUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
- United States v. HarnishUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
- United States v. AndertenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. LongUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. VangelistiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
- United States v. Baez-MartinezU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1977
- United States v. KnechtUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978