Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Brodsky

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided May 29, 2003No. CIV.A. 03-10005-EFHPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HARRINGTON, Senior District Judge.

This matter is before the Court upon defendants’ motions to dismiss. Defendant Brodsky has moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant Reilly has moved under Rule 12(b)(1) for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter, as well as under Rule 12(b)(6). Because the Court grants Defendant Brod- sky’s motion to dismiss brought under Rule 12(b)(6) and this dismissal affects the entire complaint as it relates to both defendants, the Court…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Valerie Watterson v. Eileen PageCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  2. Rostker v. GoldbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Alternative Energy, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  4. Banco Santander De Puerto Rico v. Lopez-StubbeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  5. Gorski v. New Hampshire Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Elgin v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API