State v. Howell
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtDuggan, J.
This is an interlocutory appeal from a ruling by the Superior Court (Nicolosi, J.), denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictments against him. See Sup. Ct. R. 8. Because we conclude that prosecution of the indictments is not barred by double jeopardy, we affirm and remand.
The facts as presented in the interlocutory appeal statement are as follows. On August 17,2005, the defendant, Thomas Howell, was indicted on four counts of aggravated felonious sexual assault (AFSA) under RSA 632-A:2,1(1) (2007). Three indictments alleged that the defendant, between 1984 and 1990, knowingly…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Illinois v. SomervilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Downum v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- Lee v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State of New Hampshire v. Osahenrumwen OjoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
- State of New Hampshire v. Barion PerrySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014