Legal Opinion
State of New Hampshire v. Osahenrumwen Ojo
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided February 21, 2014No. 2012-0560PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.
The defendant, Osahenrumwen Ojo, appeals his conviction of theft by deception, see RSA 637:4 (2007), following a jury trial in Superior Court (Brown, J.). The conviction followed a previous jury trial, also in Superior Court (Brown, J.), for a related charge, which ended in a mistrial based upon a hung jury. On appeal, he argues that the Double Jeopardy Clause of the New Hampshire Constitution barred the second trial. See N.H. CONST, pt. I, art. 16. We affirm.
The record supports the following facts. On September 17, 2009, a Hillsborough County grand jury returned an indictment charging the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. PuglieseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- People v. CarbajalCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. NicklesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. Craig Michael SanbornSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
- State v. Hjalmar BjorkmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2018
- State v. PierceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2024
- State of New Hampshire v. Barion PerrySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
- State of New Hampshire v. Timothy R. VerrillSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.