Legal Opinion

Grice v. Noble

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1886PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Huron. (Wixson, J.) Assumpsit. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

Plaintiffs sued defendants in assumpsit, filing a declaration upon the common counts, under which they presented a bill of particulars as follows:

“ To sawing 502,300 feet of lumber at $2.50 per M., under contract between E. R. Grice & Bro. and Noble, Cooper & Creevy, which contract bears date April 5, 1884, $1,255.75,”

The defendants pleaded the general issue, and gave notice that they would prove, under such issue, upon the trial, that the work was done under a certain contract, (setting it out;) and that, while defendants had fulfilled their contract, the plaintiffs had failed to do so in…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stark v. DuvallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
  2. Chapel v. HullMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Morris F. Fox & Co. v. LismanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Sell v. General Electric Supply Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Brunswick Corporation v. SittasonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API