Grice v. Noble
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Huron. (Wixson, J.) Assumpsit. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
Plaintiffs sued defendants in assumpsit, filing a declaration upon the common counts, under which they presented a bill of particulars as follows:
“ To sawing 502,300 feet of lumber at $2.50 per M., under contract between E. R. Grice & Bro. and Noble, Cooper & Creevy, which contract bears date April 5, 1884, $1,255.75,”
The defendants pleaded the general issue, and gave notice that they would prove, under such issue, upon the trial, that the work was done under a certain contract, (setting it out;) and that, while defendants had fulfilled their contract, the plaintiffs had failed to do so in…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Stark v. DuvallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
- Chapel v. HullMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Morris F. Fox & Co. v. LismanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Sell v. General Electric Supply Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- Brunswick Corporation v. SittasonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.