Legal Opinion

State v. Schotl

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 15, 1971No. 41420PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Murphy, justice.

Appeal from a judgment of conviction for the offense of burglary, Minn. St. 1967, § 609.58, subd. 2(2), and the denial of a motion for judgment of acquittal notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial. Defendant contends that the court erred in permitting introduction of evidence which was the product of an unlawful search and seizure; that the offense was not committed within a dwelling as comprehended by the statute; and that the evidence was not sufficient to support the verdict.

It appears from the record that defendant, Willard Schotl, age 22, accompanied by one Gary…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Stoner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. State v. KindermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  3. Stanton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1953
  4. Ex parte VincentSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
  5. McGee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1969

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Silva v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  2. State v. HendricksonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  3. State v. YaegerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. State v. DorseyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1989
  5. State v. ZaitzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API