State v. Schotl
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Murphy, justice.
Appeal from a judgment of conviction for the offense of burglary, Minn. St. 1967, § 609.58, subd. 2(2), and the denial of a motion for judgment of acquittal notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial. Defendant contends that the court erred in permitting introduction of evidence which was the product of an unlawful search and seizure; that the offense was not committed within a dwelling as comprehended by the statute; and that the evidence was not sufficient to support the verdict.
It appears from the record that defendant, Willard Schotl, age 22, accompanied by one Gary…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Stoner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- State v. KindermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Stanton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1953
- Ex parte VincentSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
- McGee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1969
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Silva v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
- State v. HendricksonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- State v. YaegerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- State v. DorseyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1989
- State v. ZaitzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.