Ewing v. State

Defendant was convicted and sentenced for trafficking in cocaine and possession of a controlled substance. He raises three grounds on appeal, only one of which merits comment. Defendant argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained from a search of an automobile. We have previously rejected this argument in Hendrix v. State, 456 So.2d 494 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984), a case *967involving the same automobile and evidence as in this case. We have examined the other grounds raised by defendant and find them to be without merit.

Accordingly, we affirm defendant’s…