Legal Opinion

Hendrix v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 17, 1984No. 83-2404PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant was charged with carrying a concealed weapon and trafficking in cocaine, violations of sections 790.02 and 893.-135, Florida Statutes (1983), respectively. He entered a nolo contendere plea to the charges, specifically reserving the right to appeal the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained from a search of an automobile. Appellant appeals only his conviction of trafficking. We hold that the trial court did not err in denying appellant’s motion which was dis-positive of his trafficking charge.

The police clearly had probable cause to believe the automobile…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. State v. GillumDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vessel Described as One 36 Foot Mirage, BHN CBD 36011M831 Displaying Florida Registration Numbers FL5182 Em v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  2. State v. WatermanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  3. Ewing v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  4. State v. JohnsonIndian River County Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API