Legal Opinion · Dissent

Harris v. Zee

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1971No. 6405Published

1DissentMowbray, J.

Respectfully, I dissent.

It is axiomatic that a trial judge has the power to review the evidence and draw reasonable inferences therefrom in passing on the question whether a jury has awarded excessive damages in a trial heard before him. Collins v. Lucky Mkts., Inc., 79 Cal.Rptr. 454 (Cal.App. 1969), and Gordon v. Strawther Enterprises, Inc., 78 Cal.Rptr. 417 (Cal.App. 1969). In doing so he must, however, keep in mind the provisions of NRCP 59(a)(6):

"RULE 59. NEW TRIALS; AMENDMENT OF JUDGMENTS
"(a) Grounds. A new trial may be granted to all or any of the parties and on all or part of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gordon v. Strawther Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Collins v. Lucky Markets, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Cartier v. Liberty Laundry, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API