Legal Opinion

Rankin v. City of Philadelphia

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 31, 1997No. Civil Action 96-2882PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.

Plaintiff Wayne G. Rankin (“Rankin”) brought this action against defendants City of Philadelphia (the “City”), Michael Gordon (“Gordon”), James Coleman (“Coleman”) and Episcopal Long Term Care, Inc./Philadelphia Nursing Home (“Episcopal”) under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West 1994) and Pennsylvania’s Whistleblower Law, 43 Pa.Stat.Ann. tit. 43, §§ 1421-1428 (West 1991). Rankin alleges that the defendants fired him because he refused to cover up health and safety violations he discovered in the course of his employment. He claims that this termination…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bailets v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Deborah Klein v. Douglas WeidnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  3. Ballinger v. Delaware River Port AuthorityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
  4. Jurimex Kommerz Transit G.M.B.H. v. Case Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2001
  5. Albright v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API