Legal Opinion

MacNeill v. Wood

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 12, 1944No. 14741PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Chief Justice.

1. “The defendant in a mandamus suit can not bring a bill of exceptions to this court merely for the purpose of reviewing a judgment overruling a demurrer to the petition!; but in such case he' should preserve his exceptions and come to this court only after a ’final judgment against him, and in the bill of exceptions then brought he should assign error upon the final judgment." • Bridges v. Poole, 176 Ga. 500 (168 S. E. 577), and cit.; Board of Education of Miller Co. v. Sheffield, 177 Ga. 100 (169 S. E. 302).

2. The only exception in the present case is to the overruling…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tillman v. GrooverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
  2. Bridges v. PooleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  3. Dooly v. GatesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  4. Board of Education v. SheffieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of MacOn v. HerringtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  2. Nichols v. HamptonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API