Legal Opinion

Dooly v. Gates

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 16, 1941No. 13763PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reid, Chief Justice.

In the bill of exceptions error is assigned on the overruling of a demurrer to a petition for mandamus. It does not appear that mandamus absolute has been granted, and no error is assigned on such a judgment. We have several times ruled that a writ of error of this character is premature. Bridges v. Poole, 176 Ga. 500 (168 S. E. 577); Board of Education of Miller County v. Sheffield, 177 Ga. 100 (169 S. E. 302); Ramsey v. Mingledorff, 183 Ga. 701 (189 S. E. 521). The writ of error is dismissed, with direction, that the plaintiff in error be allowed to file the copy of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bridges v. PooleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  2. Board of Education v. SheffieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  3. Ramsey v. MingledorffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dooly v. GatesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  2. Darden v. RobertsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  3. Nichols v. HamptonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  4. MacNeill v. WoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  5. Rainey v. PorterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API