Flores v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
2Per curiam
The offense is murder; the punishment is confinement for seventy five years. The court of appeals affirmed the adjudication of guilt, but reversed and remanded as to punishment. Flores v. State, 866 S.W.2d 682 (Tex.App. — Houston [1st] 1993).1
The granted issue in this cause is whether the court of appeals correctly concluded that “even if evidence of the prior unadjudicated offense were admissible in the guilt stage to show consciousness of guilt, it was not admissible at the punishment phase.”2
This case was tried in early October 1992; the…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Grunsfeld v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Miller-El v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Hargrove v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Hoffman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by2 opinions
- Bryan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Persimmon Ridge Partners EO, L.P., Russ Vandenburg, and Martha Vandenburg v. Fannie MaeTexas Supreme Court · 2015