Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Spears

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided November 3, 1988No. 88-0401-CRPublished

1DissentSundby, J.

Kenneth Spears is guilty of a heinous crime: causing the death of two persons, including a five-year-old girl, by the intoxicated and reckless operation of a motor vehicle. I would not hesitate to impose the maximum penalty the law allows for his offense. But in which offense-slot does his conduct fit? The state charged Spears with second-degree murder, sec. 940.02, Stats. Spears acknowledges he is guilty of reckless homicide, sec. 940.06. Because it is debatable whether Spear’s conduct, heinous as it was, evinced a depraved mind, regardless *449of human life, a necessary element of second-degree…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. BangertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. BaldwinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Hagenkord v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Virgil v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API