Legal Opinion
United States v. Anthony Eugene Doyle
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided May 25, 2017No. 14-12181PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ED CARNES, Chief Judge:
In the pre-Booker era, we presumed prejudice from a district court’s failure to ask a defendant if he had anything to say before sentence was pronounced, except in one circumstance. The exception was where the defendant was sentenced at the low end of the applicable mandatory guidelines range. United States v. Quintana, 300 F.3d 1227, 1232 (11th Cir. 2002). The question before us is whether that low-end exception to a presumption of prejudice still applies in the post-Booker, advisory guidelines era. If it does, the defendant before us is not entitled to be resentenced…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. IreyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Pepper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. Vergil Vladimir GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Nelson Cristiano Machado, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Junior Jean BaptisteCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- United States v. James Dale LittleCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- Deshawn Lemonte Wheeler v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2026
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.