Loomis v. Lewis
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Motion by the defendants, Alonzo Lewis and another, doing business under the firm name of Lewis & Hull, as attorneys in fact of Charles F. Brooks and others, for a new trial upon a case containing exceptions, ordered to be heard at the Appellate Division in the first instance, upon the verdict of a jury in favor of the plaintiff, rendered by direction of the court after a trial of the Kings County Trial Term.
1Opinion of the Court
Woodward, J.:
The defendants in this action, as attorneys in fact for various parties doing business as the Isthmus Lloyds of the City of Hew York, and authorized to issue policies of insurance in the name of the underwriters whose names are set forth in the summons, are alleged in the complaint to have “ heretofore, and on or about the 24th day of September, 1897, . * * * ' duly entered into a contract with said Huse & Loomis Ice and Transportation Company, by a policy of insurance numbered 21,922, issued by the said Isthmus Lloyds of the City of Hew York, in which and by which defendants…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Peabody v. . SatterleeNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Clendinning v. LindnerThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1894
3Cited by2 opinions
- National Factors, Inc. v. WatersNew York Supreme Court · 1964
- Manhattan Fire & Marine Insurance v. Paul Tishman Co.New York Supreme Court · 1953