Legal Opinion

Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. McKinnell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 19, 1915No. 8064PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Tarrant County; Marviri. H. Brown, Judge. Action by Harry L. McKinnell against the Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway'Company. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtDunklin, J.

As a result of a collision between two trains operated by the Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Company, near the town of Davis, Okl.-, Harry L. Mc-Kinnell, a railway mail agent, who was riding on one of those trains, sustained personal injuries, and he instituted this suit against the company to recover damages therefor. He recovered judgment for the sum of $6,500, and the company has appealed.

[1] As one of the grounds stated in the defendant’s motion for new trial, it was alleged, in substance, that the jury, during their retirement for the purpose of reaching a verdict, improperly…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Flores v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Texas & N. O. R. Co. v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. City Nat. Bank of El Paso v. El Paso & N. E. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. Texas Coca Cola Bottling Co. v. LovejoyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Gulf, C. &. S. F. Ry. Co. v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API