Lowell v. United Behavioral Health
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 TAMAR LOWELL, ET AL., CASE NO. 20-cv-01989-YGR 6 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO TRANSFER 7 vs. Re: Dkt. No. 20 8 UNITED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, ET AL., 9 Defendants. 10 Plaintiffs Tamar and Thomas Lowell bring this action under the Employment Retirement 11 Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) on behalf of themselves and their beneficiary son, A.L., 12 related to a denial of benefits under an employee welfare benefit plan. Now before the Court is a 13 motion to transfer this action to either the United States District…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Hughes Aircraft Co. v. JacobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Jones v. GNC Franchising, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Lou v. BelzbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Mongeluzo v. Baxter Travenol Long Term Disability Benefit PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.