Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Ariyoshi

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 5, 1989No. 88-1543PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODWIN, Chief Judge:

This is the third time this challenge by Hawaii private land owners to recent developments in state water law has been before us. In Robinson v. Ariyoshi, 753 F.2d 1468 (9th Cir.1985), we held that the decision of the Supreme Court of Hawaii in McBryde Sugar Co. v. Robinson, 54 Haw. 174, 504 P.2d 1330, aff'd on rehearing 55 Haw. 260, 517 P.2d 26 (1973), appeal dismissed and certs. denied, 417 U.S. 962, 94 S.Ct. 3164, 41 L.Ed.2d 1135 and 417 U.S. 976, 94 S.Ct. 3183, 41 L.Ed.2d 1146 (1974), deprived appellees of vested water rights that had been recognized by prior Hawaii…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Cox v. Chesapeake & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Robinson v. AriyoshiHawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Selwyn A. Robinson v. George R. Ariyoshi, Governor, and McBryde Sugar Company, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. McBRYDE SUGAR COMPANY, LIMITED v. RobinsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Water Use Permit ApplicationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Robinson v. AriyoshiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. Elks National Foundation v. WeberCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. Lefcourt v. SUPERIOR COURT, COUNTY SAN FRANCISCODistrict Court, N.D. California · 1999
  5. In Re Water Use Permit ApplicationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API