Legal Opinion

In Re Water Use Permit Applications

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 2000No. 21309Published

1Opinion of the Court

9 P.3d 409 (2000)

94 Hawai`i 97

In the Matter of the WATER USE PERMIT APPLICATIONS, Petitions for Interim Instream Flow Standard Amendments, and Petitions for Water Reservations for the Waihole Ditch Combined Contested Case Hearing.

No. 21309.

Supreme Court of Hawai`i.

August 22, 2000.

Reconsideration Denied September 17, 2000.

As Amended November 29, 2000.

Gilbert D. Butson of Reinwald O'Connor & Playdon, on the briefs, for Appellee/Cross-Appellant Puu Makakilo.

Stephen K.C. Mau and Cheryl A. Nakamura of Rush, Moore, Craven, Sutton, Morry & Beh, on the briefs, for Appellee/Cross-Appellant The…

2Cases cited218 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

213 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API