Legal Opinion · Dissent

Don Ater v. David Armstrong and Leon E. Jones, Sr.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 26, 1992No. 90-5424Published

1DissentKrupansky, Senior Circuit Judge

The single justification for endorsing the constitutional validity of subsection (21) of Kentucky Revised Statute (KRS) section 189.570 and its regulation of first amendment rights of free expression in a public forum hangs on the fragile thread of its articulated purpose of promoting a significant public interest, in this case, the protection of motorists and pedestrians from the hazards’ inherent to their interacting activities while jointly using the roadways of Kentucky. Absent that justification, the constitutional challenge to section (21) as an infringement of first amendment rights to…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API