Legal Opinion

Murfreesboro Medical Clinic, P.A. v. David Udom - Concurring and Dissenting

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 2005No. M2003-00313-SC-S09-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE February 2, 2005 Session MURFREESBORO MEDICAL CLINIC, P.A. v. DAVID UDOM Appeal by Permission from the Court of Appeals, Middle Section Chancery Court for Rutherford County No. 02-5739CV Robert E. Corlew, III, Chancellor No. M2003-00313-SC-S09-CV - Filed June 29, 2005 JANICE M. HOLDER, J., concurring and dissenting. Although I agree that the restrictive covenant in this case is unenforceable, I write separately to voice my disagreement with the majority’s holding that restrictive covenants involving physicians are unenforceable and void unless…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Valley Medical Specialists v. FarberArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Lazy Seven Coal Sales, Inc. v. Stone & Hinds, P.C.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Spiegel v. Thomas, Mann & Smith, P.C.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Swafford v. HarrisTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Iredell Digestive Disease Clinic v. PetrozzaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API