Legal Opinion

United States v. Armour & Co.

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided January 27, 1943No. 13807 CriminalPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHT, District Judge.

The indictment in this cause charges the defendants with having knowingly and continuously engaged in a conspiracy to fix prices for the sale of hogs in the Oklahoma City livestock market, the defendants named in the indictment being two corporations and five individuals.

The government, in its brief, states: “* * * paragraphs 17 and 18 charge the crime, paragraph 17 charging defendants with a conspiracy to fix prices on hogs purchased on the Oklahoma City livestock market and paragraph 18 setting out the means adopted to effect the objective of price fixing charged in…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Pettibone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. United States v. CarllSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  5. United States v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1944
  2. United States v. MercerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1955
  3. United States v. Central Supply Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1947
  4. United States v. Safeway Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1943
  5. United States v. Ozark Canners Ass'nDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API