Legal Opinion

Murray v. Spalding

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 2005No. 31044PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing this action without prejudice as to the named defendants for the failure to serve them with the summons and complaint within six months as required by Rule 4(a)(2) of the Idaho Rules of Civil Procedure. The Plain-tiff, who is incarcerated in the penitentiary, contends that he showed good cause for the failure to serve the summons and complaint timely. We hold that he has not shown that the district court erred in finding lack of good cause.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On August 15, 2000, the Plaintiff-Appellant, Leon Murray, filed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Row v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Twin Falls County v. CoatesIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Head v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Miller v. CallearIdaho Supreme Court · 2004

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Crowley v. CritchfieldIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Parsons v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Straub v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Valiant Idaho v. VP IncorporatedIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Bach v. MillerIdaho Supreme Court · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API