Legal Opinion
Adams v. Wolf
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided November 13, 1931PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff sued in assumpsit. Defendant plead a set-off. Trial was had before a jury and verdict rendered on November 8th, 1928, for plaintiff for a sum less than that claimed in the declaration.
On November 9th, 1928, plaintiff moved the court to allow him fifteen days from the rendition of the verdict in which to file a motion for new trial. The motion was granted on November 10th, 1928, and the time for filing a motion for new trial, by order of the court, was extended to November 23rd, 1928.
On November 21st, 1928, the plaintiff made and submitted his motion for new trial. On December 4th,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Arms v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
- DeSoto Holding Co. v. BoyerSupreme Court of Florida · 1923
- Gulf Refining Co. v. HowardSupreme Court of Florida · 1921
- Madden v. KillingerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1957
- Citizens Bank v. Williams, Etc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Killebrew v. Jackson City Lines, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1955
- Norwich Union Indemnity Co. v. WillisSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
- Howland v. CatesSupreme Court of Florida · 1949
- Florida Dairies Co. v. WardSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
- Bishop v. ChillingworthSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.