Legal Opinion
Heslop v. Robert A. Grahame, Inc.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 23, 1942No. 11PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
Appellant brought suit below on an open account. Trial was had before the court without a jury, resulting in a finding and judgment for the defendant.
The record on appeal contains two statements of proceedings and evidence, one being entitled “Plaintiff’s Statement of Proceedings and Evidence,” and the other “Defendant’s Statement of Proceedings and Evidence.” The two statements are in conflict as to the proceedings had and evidence received at the trial, yet both were approved by the trial judge. This situation is accounted for by appellant in his brief with the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hume v. BowieSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Malony v. AdsitSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Harrah v. MorgenthauDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1937
- Marvin's Credit, Inc. v. HallCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Davidge v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- District Hauling & Construction Co. v. ArgerakisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
- Levy v. BryceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
- Barrett v. Adkins Furniture Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945
- Cross v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
- James v. GreenbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.