Legal Opinion

(PS) George v. Sohal

District Court, E.D. California

Decided April 12, 2022No. 2:22-cv-00564Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LAWRENCE E. GEORGE, No. 2:22–cv–564–KJM–KJN PS 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF 13 v. SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION 14 TRANS SOHAL and RAJ FINAF (ECF No. 2.) 15 DefendantS. 16 17 Plaintiff, who is proceeding without counsel in this action, requests leave to proceed in 18 forma pauperis.1 (ECF No. 2.) See

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(authorizing the commencement of an 19 action “without prepayment of fees or security” by a person who is unable to pay such fees). The 20 court finds that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API