Legal Opinion

Cook v. Attapulgus Clay Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 29, 1936No. 24750PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

The purpose of the very able trial judge in seéking to facilitate a final disposition of the case by having this court pass on the evidence without the cost and expense of another trial is to be commended; and we have diligently sought to ascertain if it lay within our power to pass upon the questions of evidence made by the record as now presented. After mature consideration we have reached the conclusion that we can not do so. *612Neither of the cases cited in the judgment and opinion of the trial judge as authority for his grant of a nonsuit after verdict and judgment and in vacation (Hill v.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Georgia Railway & Electric Co. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Barnes v. CarterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. HardenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  4. Exposition Cotton Mills v. Western & Atlantic RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  5. Hines v. McLellanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Holton v. LankfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. Carter v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  3. Collins v. S. H. Kress & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  4. Albany Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  5. Cox v. LeRoyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API