Estate of Glenda Rhoades
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part 1
CONCURRING1 AND DISSENTING OPINION
2Concurring in part, dissenting in part · WalkerSue Walker, Justice
I. Introduction
This is an appeal from the trial’ court’s summary judgment construing the will of the decedent, Glenda Rhoades. Because the Majority Opinion fails to properly apply the rules of will construction to Rhoades’s will and construes Rhoades’s will contrary to her expressed intent, I dissent.
II. Background
Rhoades signed a will in which she devised all of her interest in her residential homestead, all of her personal property, and all of the rest of her estate ’to her father Glen; however, if her father predeceased her—as is the case here—she provided…
3Cases cited16 opinions
- San Antonio Area Foundation v. LangTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- McMurry v. StanleyTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- Hysaw v. DawkinsTexas Supreme Court · 2016
- Bergin v. BerginTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- Welch v. StraachTexas Supreme Court · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.