Legal Opinion
Sonnenberg v. Nolan Motors Inc.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided July 1, 1942PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
The plaintiff by his contract having waived any implied warranty, any recovery must be based only on a breach of the uniform warranty made part of the agreement. (Personal Property Law, § 152; Plimpton v. Brown Bros. Co., 224 N. Y. 724; Lumbrazo v. Woodruff, 256 N. Y. 92, 96; Lee v. Industrial Laundry Mach. Co., 261 App. Div. 741; Sayeg v. Gloria Light Co., 236 App. Div. 761; 106 A. L. R. 1466.)
The order should be reversed, motion granted, with $30 costs to appellant against plaintiff to abide the event, and judgment vacated.
Hammer. Shientag and Miller, JJ., concur.
Order reversed, etc.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lumbrazo v. WoodruffNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Plimpton v. . Brown Brothers CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Lee v. Industrial Laundry Machinery Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Sayeg v. Gloria Light Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
3Cited by1 opinion
- Broderick Haulage, Inc. v. MacK-international Motor Truck Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956