Broderick Haulage, Inc. v. MacK-international Motor Truck Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
The material facts of this case are not in dispute. Plaintiff purchased a number of trucks from defendant for use in its haulage business. When it found that the size of the trucks prevented their free and unrestricted use, it instituted this action to recover damages for breach of a claimed implied warranty of fitness for the intended use. Plaintiff makes no charge of fraud or misrepresentation, nor does it seek to rescind the contract. It relies solely upon the existence of an implied warranty that the trucks would be fit for the use to which plaintiff intended to put them.
The written…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fogelson v. Rackfay Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Lumbrazo v. WoodruffNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Plimpton v. . Brown Brothers CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Railroad Waterproofing Corp. v. Memphis Supply, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- National Cash Register Co. v. LyonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pipe Welding Supply Co. Inc. v. Gas Atmospheres, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1961