Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Gipe

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 15, 1951No. Appeals, 156 and 157PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Reno, J.,

By separate bills, appellant was indicted for perjury and forgery. They were consolidated for trial and he was convicted on both charges. He was sentenced for perjury; sentence on the forgery conviction was suspended. He appealed both convictions.

The charges grew out of a civ^il action wherein Peirce-Phelps, Inc., sued Helen C. Richards, appellant’s sister, whose electrical appliance business he managed, on a merchandise account for $497.97. At the trial in Lancaster County on April 25, 1950, appellant was his sister’s only witness. He admitted receiving the merchandise and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Moszczynski v. AsheSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Holly v. AsheSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Shannon v. CastnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  4. Commonwealth v. LevySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Commonwealth v. WinegradSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MorrisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Commonwealth v. DixonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Commonwealth v. AndersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Com. v. Sexton, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Com. v. Frey, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API