Legal Opinion
Finch v. SMALL BUSINESS ADMIN., OF RICHMOND, VA.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided February 24, 1960No. 105PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
No reference is made in the District Attorney’s motion to the merits of plaintiff’s -alleged cause of action. He asserts that a special appearance is entered solely for the purpose of moving to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction of the person. If, as plaintiff contends, the motion alleged simultaneously matters pertaining to other defenses, this, under Session Laws of 1951, Chapter 245, now G.S. 1-134.1, would not waive the objection as to lack of jurisdiction.
The only purported service of process was as follows: According to the affidavit of a deputy sheriff of Henrico County, Virginia, a copy…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Belknap v. SchildSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
3Cited by6 opinions
- A.L.T. Corporation v. Small Business AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- United States ex rel. Administrator of the Small Business Administration v. Charter Bank NorthwestCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Ward v. Kolman Manufacturing CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Pramco, LLC. v. TorresDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2003
- US ON BEHALF OF ADM'R, ETC. v. Charter Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.