Legal Opinion

City of Sacramento v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 26, 1980No. Civ. 19491PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EVANS, J.

In Leslie v. Roe (1974) 41 Cal.App.3d 104 [116 Cal.Rptr. 386] (hg. den.), the court held that indigency does not entitle a party in a civil action to a transcript prepared at public expense to assist in the *717appeal of an adverse decision. That principle was followed in Civil Service Commission v. Superior Court (Price) (1976) 63 Cal.App.3d 627 [133 Cal.Rptr. 825] (hg. den.) where the court, faced with a factual context identical to the instant proceeding, held that a court reviewing an administrative decision “is without power to order that an indigent person seeking judicial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Leslie v. RoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. Civil Service Commission v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Woodard v. Personnel Commission of the Compton Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hittle v. Santa Barbara County Employees Retirement Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Austin v. ValverdeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. City of Sacramento v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. Hittle v. Santa Barbara County Employees Retirement Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API